{"id":895,"date":"2014-03-14T09:10:21","date_gmt":"2014-03-14T13:10:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.granitestatefutures.org\/?p=895"},"modified":"2014-03-14T09:10:21","modified_gmt":"2014-03-14T13:10:21","slug":"bow-voters-reject-public-safety-building-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/2014\/03\/14\/bow-voters-reject-public-safety-building-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"Bow voters reject public safety building plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Bow voters reject public safety building plan<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>By Alllie Morris<br \/>\nMonitor staff<br \/>\nFriday, March 14, 2014 <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Bow residents overwhelmingly rejected plans to construct a $6.8 million public safety building, one year after a more expensive plan was narrowly defeated.<\/p>\n<p>The condition of the station will have to wait until the meeting resumes March 24.<br \/>\nAfter an hour of voting, the tally came to 425-257. It needed a two-thirds majority to pass. A separate article, which would have approved a $200,000 geothermal heating and cooling system for the building, was also rejected, 410-271. The plan would have replaced the town\u2019s outdated fire station with a new building housing the fire, police and emergency management departments across the street.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.concordmonitor.com\/home\/11132596-95\/bow-voters-reject-public-safety-building-plan\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Yes these town centers are all part of a huge push for urbanization of our small towns.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bow voters reject public safety building plan By Alllie Morris Monitor staff Friday, March 14, 2014 Bow residents overwhelmingly rejected plans to construct a $6.8 million public safety building, one year after a more expensive plan was narrowly defeated. The condition of the station will have to wait until the meeting resumes March 24. After [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bow"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granitestatefutures.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}