Girard at Large Continues to Hammer Plan Pinardville

From Girard at Large Radio Blog:

“We do not believe you and we are not stupid.”

“That’s what Pinardville resident and Plan Pinardville opponent Gaetane Benner wrote in a letter to Plan Pinardville ad hoc committee member Tony Marts. Marts, a local attorney who has been involved in several Goffstown development projects, issued a letter on Tuesday defending his participation on the ad hoc committee overseeing the development of the controversial master plan. Benner challenged Marts’ representation that he’d only been marginally involved in development activity citing his involvement in the mixed use development involving Rite Aide and a swath of low income housing developed by Greater Manchester Neighborworks along Mast Road. She also wrote that his name was all over the documents on the controversial Moose Club apartment development that’s building forty eight apartment units in Pinardville. Benner also wrote that eliminating the residential neighborhoods from the zoning proposal was quote just another attempt to fool us end quote. She believes that if Mast Road is developed as proposed, traffic pressures will force bypass roads to be built and lead to the takings of back yards to create alleyways as envisioned in the plan. We’ve posted Benner’s letter with this newscast at Girard at Large. It’s an interesting read of the various issues the neighbors have with the plan. We’ve also reposted Marts’ letter.

In a related matter, our friends at GoffstownToday.com are publishing a five part series on the proposed plans and members of the ad hoc committee. They’ve raised some interesting points and questions, not the least of which are the conflicts of interest that may exist between members of the ad hoc committee and the intentions of the proposed plan.”

In our opinion, this is what every town should be doing to put an end to this GSF nonsense in their towns, and we commend Girard and Wynne for taking this on.

Who Cares What the UN ‘Declares’?

“The United Nations has declared that a human right exists for reliable access to safe and clean drinking water and sanitation which, along with other domestic purposes, accounts for about 7 to 10 per cent of all water use.”

The UN knows that water is currently controlled locally. This is why it is so important to get regional plans installed that will override local control in order to take water rights away from private individuals and put it in the hands of the state.

Therefore they recommend that “Priorities for national–local priority setting include pro-poor tariff structures; national food and nutrition strategies that take into account consequences for water and energy; bioenergy and food production; creating a culture of wastewater reuse and water recycling; strengthening land governance and integrating land use management for effective use of bioenergy by the poor; water and energy savings and reducing non-revenue water and electricity; sustainable management of groundwater; use of salt tolerant food crops, fodder crops and biofuels in coastal and saline affected areas; reducing vulnerability to natural disasters; and reducing pollutants of water and land bodies.”

Read more about the UN’s desires for more global governance at the UN website…

Plan Pinardville Won’t See the Light of Day

plan_pinardville

This won’t make the proponents of Granite State Future happy but according to those in the know in Goffstown, Plan Pinardville won’t see the light of day.

Thanks to Girard at Large for covering this small portion of Granite State Future’s effects on a NH community, GSF’s not-so ‘community-based’ ideas are not being well received by the residents of that small area.

Please listen in to Hour 2 of Girard at Large for the details.

Girard at Large can be heard locally on WLMW 90.7 FM and we thank him for taking up this issue.

Plan Pinardville is GSF and Agenda 21 in microcosm.

Rowdy Protester at Plan Bay Area Meeting

Celeste Paradise uses her 1 minute of public comment time to sing a protest song in frustration at the “Plan Bay Area” meeting in Oakland California before her microphone was abruptly cut off.

Plan Bay Area is a $280 billion plan styled after the United Nations “Agenda 21” green agenda of their version of global “sustainability” principles in 1992, and signed by presidents Bush (42) and Bill Clinton as the direction for America to follow. A coalition of liberal and conservatives formed to fight the plan for the 9 counties in the SF Bay Area. The plan was approved after a two year battle.

If the above video does not appear on your device, use this direct link:
http://www.youtube.com/v/DxO9U6FbQ2Y?hl

Local Zoning Laws Attacked in Westchester

“A number of years ago some less than intelligent politicians took some money from the U.S. Federal Housing and Urban Development Agency and thought they could use the money without fulfilling the obligations that come with it.”

http://www.blogcastalia.com/coming-to-your-neighborhood-new-zoning-laws/


Zoning laws are not a violation of civil rights!

If the above video does not appear on your device, use this direct link:
http://www.youtube.com/v/9KZJYO2XvpM

From Rosa Koire

Rosa Koire describes what Plan Bay Area would do to her state. It is the same everywhere.

“This fight is not local — it is national. The United States is undergoing a radical transformation as hundreds of regional plans are approved by complicit or ignorant city councils and county supervisors. These plans are called Sustainable Ohio, PlaNY, Granite State Future, One Valley One Vision, Power of 32, Vision 2050, Blueprint, Focus, One Region, Seven50 — look around for it in your town. Plan Bay Area/ One Bay Area is the name for the Plan in the San Francisco nine county 101 city area. This plan is similar to all of the regional plans in the nation — it calls for high density residential/mixed use (Smart Growth) transit oriented development in the center of every city and town, development that will be subsidized by your tax dollars. Regional plans are called ‘living documents’ and are designed to change every 4 years — updating is what they call it. These plans become more restrictive every time.

Plan Bay Area is different. It is your future if you don’t stop it.

Plan Bay Area is the most radical, damaging regional plan in the United States. We believe it is the template, the model, for the rest of the Plans. Plan Bay Area identifies Priority Development Areas and Priority Conservation Areas and establishes quotas. Plan Bay Area requires 80% of all future residential development and 66% of all future commercial development to be constructed in just 4% of the land area in nine counties and 101 cities. Hundreds of thousands of acres will be undevelopable. Land that is inside of urban growth boundaries. Urban land. This will devastate land values and land use for generations.

Plan Bay Area places a de facto building moratorium on all rural property in all nine counties. Plan Bay Area says that 100% of development must be in urban areas. Plan Bay Areas calls for 0% — zero — of non-farm development in rural areas.

Plan Bay Area is creating the ‘islands of human habitation’ called for in UN Agenda 21. Restricting development to high density multi-story apartments and condos in the center of your city while imposing new zoning codes that don’t allow for anything else, your government is redesigning the future. You are paying for it. If you object you’ll be ignored, shamed, ridiculed, called a racist, a NIMBY, selfish, and a patriot. When did ‘PATRIOT’ become a bad thing? When regionalization/globalization began erasing your jurisdictional boundaries. Your city, county, state, and ultimately, federal boundaries.

Plan Bay Area empowers regional unelected boards as the governing body for the ‘region.’ Through federal mandates the money for infrastructure, eminent domain, land development, and transportation transformation comes into your ‘region.’ The money is managed and distributed by a regional board — the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and council of government (COG).

You’ll see grant money from the Partnership for Sustainable Communities (HUD, EPA, DOT), and from private foundations partnering with government. Local governments starved for funds and directed by state legislation reach for these grants without realizing the consequences.”

Yes This Can Happen in NH

This is a perfect example of what can happen when sustainability grants are enforced by unelected regional boards. Frankly, if people wait until this point it may be too late.

From Tom DeWeese, property rights activist:

Jennie Granato, a resident and tax-paying citizen of Montgomery County, Ohio, has found herself without a front yard and very little to show for it.

Because the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC), as part of a $5M bike path extension, has begun to seize up private property for their “essential” project, including almost the entirety of Miss Granato’s front lawn.

The bike path will come within seven feet of her front door!!

The bike path is being forced by the MVRPC, a non-elected regional planning commission that is driven by federal Sustainable Development grant money – with no input from local residents or property owners. The local country commissioners and the township trustees are helping to enforce this program.

Jennie and her family own a historic farm outside Dayton, Ohio. They have tried to negotiate and reason with this unelected planning commission. But the MCRPC has done nothing but ignore her pleas. And they have offered her only a pittance of compensation for this taking of her land.

The fact is that Jenny and her family still own this property – YET the township has already come in and removed trees and dug up the ground!

It’s her property!!!

Again – the bike path is going through her property only 7 feet from her front door!

The Granato’s house is a 150 year old farmhouse that a study said “lacked historic integrity”. Apparently that makes it okay to seize the privately owned property in front of it and pave over the entire front lawn.

And now a great tragedy has occurred as Jennie has tried to fight this outrage. Just days ago, as the government bulldozers arrived and started their destruction of the front yard, Jennie’s 85 year old mother became so upset over the injustice of government ramming a bike path into her front door of her private home, she suffered a heart attack and died.

Is this how our government now treats law abiding American citizens?

The MVRPC is an unelected agency. Neither Jennie nor any of her neighbors voted to institute the agency or its policies.

There was no vote for this bike path.

There was no referendum on the ballot to approve this project or the spending of the tax dollars.

Yet the MVRPC has imposed itself on privately owned property, giving the owner no say in the matter and giving her virtually nothing in exchange for the land they are taking away.

This is why regional planning is so dangerous. County planners and commissioners see nothing wrong with seizing up private property with little compensation to the owners in the name of “public good”. There is no world in which a bike path through your neighbor’s front yard is “essential”. If we allow governmental and non-governmental agencies to dictate “public good” at the expense of individuals and their property, they will trample all over our rights

The American Policy Center has issued warning after warning about the dangers of Sustainable Development and the enforcement of top down control through non-elected boards and regional government. Here it is in all of its raw outrage.

Take a good look America! Jennie’s tragedy will be that of every American property owner…

This is what is happening all over the country. If you have been following Girard at Large, you know that something similar is about to happen in Pinardville, unless it is stopped.

Video

It’s All About Sovereignty

Our federal government, as it should be clear to all now, is devoted to bringing about world government. If you follow the Twitter account for the US State Department you can see that all they care about is the global agenda.

No-United-Nations

Our country to them, is divided into 10 regions, not states, the very same as the UN sees us.

And same as the planners like Andres Duany who think Miami and Cuba are a region, and Texas and Mexico are one and the same.

As war criminal Kissinger said, anyone who opposes this “international order” is a terrorist.

Many of us have been saying this since 1980 — our sovereignty is the key issue and has been compromised since we allowed the central banks (Federal Reserve) to take over in 1913. It’s done nothing but go downhill from there for our nation state, including the formation of the intrusive United Nations, who fancies itself the world’s governmental seat.

Now, no one is laughing.

It’s coming home to roost, people are seeing Agenda 21 at their doorsteps, and are now not so quick to say it’s a ‘conspiracy’.