What is “Form-Based Code”?

Laconia and Weirs

Planning director, Shanna Saunders calls the $50,000 grant for the “storytelling” development “our storytelling grant.” This grant awarded to the city by the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority is to fund the development of architectural standards for downtown and The Weirs.

The stakeholders are the Ironwood Design Group LLC of Exeter and Sheer McCrystal-Paison Architecture Inc. of New London. FBC, meaning Form Base Code, is a departure from conventional zoning. FBC zoning defines a one block parcel and is a method to REGULATE the development of buildings, floor areas, car free movement, garden cities, new urbanism, settlement growth, smart growth, and Transition Towns.

At a minimum, a FBC, written to enable or preserve a specific urban form, consists of a building form, and public spaces, and standards keyed to a REGULATORY plan. An urban design is the is intention or goal, the form base code is the regulatory tool to achieve it. FBC is a tool to provide local government the regulatory means to achieve development objectives with greater certainty by-passing local ZBA authority and the board of selectman and elected officials.

Ironwood Design Group is all about landscape architecture, urban design, and environmental plans for someone else’s property. This group is affiliated with Plan NH/Granite State Future. Stakeholders like this company profit by using this FBC, whose focus is primarily on Regulating [the word of worry] urban form and less on land use. This will infringe on our personal property rights and is unconstitutional, as stated in Art. 2 Natural Rights, in the NH Bill of Rights!

Regulate, my “worry” word means: “to control or direct by a rule, principle,or method, to adjust in accordance with some standard or requirement.”

Form based codes include:

Architectual Standards – these are regulations controlling external architectual materials and quality.

Landscaping Standards – regulations controlling landscape design, and plant materials on Private Property as they impact public spaces, regulations about parking lot screening and shading, maintaining sight lines, insuring unobstructed pedestrian movements.

Signage Standards – regulations controlling allowable signage sizes, materials, illumination and placement.

Environmental Resource Standards – regulations controlling issues such as storm water drainage and infiltration, development on slopes, tree protection, and solar access.

Once you lose development rights, you have essentially lost control of your property, no matter what the people or the local government proclaim. Only you are responsible for the property taxes, and your land use is regulated!!

Development rights to one’s property are infringed by obeying shifting regulations and enhanced “best practices” mandated by the new development rights’ holder.

Please research form base code and refuse this grab by people who are out to make money and could care less about the individual. I love the Weirs and its antiquity and style, do not change the view or be regulated into this ruse to control your individual rights, and behavior! The city of Dover and Strafford, have FBC and are unhappy with the regulations!! They were duped by conversations with only the input of a minority of people, and without a majority of the voting public. Beware of these “listening sessions” employed by Plan NH and NH Listens, using the Delphi Technique to obtain an already written agenda, while giving the public the illusion that they created the issues!

Does the Planning Director know about this devious and unethical method of stealing the residents’ right to regulate their own property? The residents of Laconia need to ask and obtain the knowledge about FBC and go to the Granite State Futures web site and learn about how the LRPC is involved in our everyday behaviors, and is planning to change us, and our liberties as property owners and citizens. Another point of interest is that the 9 planning commissions are unelected people who are trying to change our great state of NH. We also need to be aware of Grants associated with the HUD-1044 grant instrument, and the strings attached, and any other grant that gives the illusion of “storytelling”. Research the Orton Family Foundation.

Goffstown Residents Oppose GSF

plan_pinardville

Listen to the audio file of the Girard at Large show where a discussion took place about “Plan Pinardville”, the GSF plan for Goffstown, NH.

See the video of the various Goffstown residents OPPOSING HUD grants which would enable zoning and planning changes and impositions on the town that residents DO NOT WANT.


The Names Will Change But the Goals Remain the Same

This post is a preview to an upcoming article on how some changes are being made in the way Agenda 21 will be implemented in the United States. Here is a quick outline of what is to come.

ecosoc

– The UN has been attempting to erase all references to Agenda 21 on their website. Due to the vast number of pages involved, this may take forever. Agenda 21 is now a household word and it’s not looked upon very favorably. The public is catching on.

– The UN has also decided that the term ‘sustainability’ has gotten an equally bad rap. So they have dissolved their United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development and focused their attempts to spread ‘global governance’ by creating two new commissions which would work under the premise of ‘economic resilience’ with the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Who can argue against economic resilience?

– At the same time, the head of the UN’s ECOSOC Tweeted the real reason this must be done: more ‘global governance’ is needed in order to better redistribute the wealth. We have no idea what this type of social justice has to do with sustainability, but that is how these bureaucrats think.

– Right on cue, the US State Dept of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has issued a notice stating that since Sustainable Communities Initiative grants were not funded in this year’s budget, they would still be included, but under the Office of Economic Resilience (OER)

– The APA, a non-governmental association of planners including unelected regional commissioners to whom they dictate, announced the changes on their website.

Anti-poverty, economic, all of this is no coincidence.

Developing…

How Transparent are Regional Planning Commissions?

bannerdivback-624x98

The Lakes Region Planning Commission held an open house last November 2013. The title ‘open house’ would have one thinking the public was welcome but apparently it was not viewed that way by some of the planners.

The Laconia Daily Sun characterized some taxpayers’ attendance with this contradictory article: Tea Party members crash LRPC Open House

Since regional planning commissions are state-created entities and part of taxpayer-funded government, they are subject to the very same right-to-know laws as any other public board or commission. (See RSA 91-A)

Here was the response from those who were accused of crashing: Tea Party members didn’t crash the party; we were invited

Apparently some planning board members share former Meredith Selectman Peter Miller’s desire for certain individuals to ‘stay out of local affairs’ and stick with federal issues. It is just amazing that Miller feels only SOME taxpayers have the right to be concerned over where their money is being spent. And in fact, federal programs are now intruding locally, so it’s very appropriate for all to get involved to fight them there.

And so it began.

In addition to the highly unethical way public input is gathered at ‘listening’ sessions, RPCs are now denying taxpayers the right to know answers to the many questions they have about the Granite State Future program and the role of the RPCs in implementation of same.

Citizen Tim Carter has asked Jerry Coogan of the Lakes Region Planning Commission, to meet with him and other members of the public and the legislature, but thus far has been refused. Carter has demanded that Regional planning officials should answer questions in public and we agree. Mr Coogan stated that “…the public has no guaranteed right to speak at a public meeting….” Please read the full exchange here: Letter from Coogan to Carter

Demand your local regional commission answer all your questions. They are required to by law. Find them from the flip menu on the right column on any page from our main website.