As anyone who read the book or has seen the movie knows, “INGSOC” is newspeak for English Socialism or the English Socialist Party, and was the fictional political party of the totalitarian government of “Oceania” (a regional name) in George Orwell’s Dystopian novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”.

INGSOC demands the complete submission – mental, moral and physical – of the people. INGSOC is a masterfully complex system of psychological control that compels confession to imagined crimes and the forgetting of rebellious thought in order to love Big Brother and the Party over oneself. The purpose of INGSOC is total political control and power over the people.

A UN organization known as ECOSOC, which stands for UN’s “Economic and Social Council”, is practically the same in principle.

ECOSOC is tasked with implementing the UN’s Agenda 2030.

As anyone who is awake and aware knows, Agenda 2030 is the UN’s plan to number, regulate, tax, and ultimately control every person, every animal, every thing, literally every blade of grass on the planet, all in the name of “sustainability”. And this NGO called the UN, which technically has no say over what our government does, but whose agenda is quite evident in every aspect of US government and education, plans to punish those who do not comply.

Regarding this article by Nathalie Risse, Ph.D. entitled “Thematic Expert for 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Canada)” of 22 May 2018, one only needs to read a few sentences before he or she can realize the amount of bureaucracy that has been created around this agenda, and how many thousands of web pages, documents, meetings and bureaucrats are involved, and to understand that Agenda 2030 is no longer a “theory”. If it is indeed a conspiracy, the UN doesn’t seem to mind who knows.

We had no idea the president of the United States had the right to appoint REGIONAL planners, but apparently in some cases this is what is happening.

President Donald Trump appoints Reno resident to Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing Board

This is the kind of top-down, unaccountable governance that is the mark of Bolshevism. The biggest problem in combating it is, first, getting the word out on it, and second, getting people to understand how it circumvents our local control.

Please spread the word by sharing this website, this blog and links from articles that speak to you about the problem of regionalism which has not only touched our property rights, but our educational system as well.

A smart city can be described as a city that incorporates the capabilities of web connectivity, analytics, mobile solutions, sensors, data collection and other technology. This can include surveillance systems utilized by law enforcement, smart congestion-mitigating traffic systems, LED streetlights equipped with motion sensors, smart grids and smart water systems.

The purpose of smart city data collection is to enable the creation of innovative new products and services that improve the quality of life in a given smart city. Smart cities have the potential to solve a variety of municipal issues. But, as is the case with technology in general, these cities are also vulnerable to serious threats.

Read more…

“The Organization of American States is the world’s oldest regional organization, dating back to the First International Conference of American States, held in Washington, D.C., from October 1889 to April 1890. That meeting approved the establishment of the International Union of American Republics, and the stage was set for the weaving of a web of provisions and institutions that came to be known as the inter-American system, the oldest international institutional system.”

So this push for world order is not new, but lately has picked up a lot of steam. According to the OAS, “The countries of the Americas agree that the Organization of American States must play a key role in ensuring that the region complies with the 2030 Sustainable Development. At stake is the future sustainable development of the hemisphere.”

Usually the ‘solution’ to their problem is globally redistributed wealth, i.e. in the form of global taxes. You may not think this affects you locally, but the philosophy behind the assertion is that your ‘region’ MUST comply with the UN’s goals.

Did you,the taxpayer, vote on this?

Read more…

To understand how the global government will be acheived, one must understand regionalism.

In a previous article we told you about the Smart Cities Caucus, made possible by a bipartisan group of Congressmen (Darrell Issa on the GOP side) and a group known as “Venture Smarter” (who actually tried to claim their efforts had nothing to do with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals but was later proven wrong).

We also wrote about the increased use of, and name change for Public Private Partnerships, which will now be called “Blended Finance“.

Here is the result of their second ‘stakeholder roundtable’ which was focused on ‘growth of cities, states, regions…’.

This is where much of the push for commuter rail, section 8 housing, and car-less cities originates.

“There is no one-size fits all solution to smart cities as each city, state, and municipality, face their own unique challenges. However, public private partnerships, with the right collection of partners – including universities, large and small businesses, NGOs – have the ability to transform our cities and regions.”

The above quote from their ‘takeaway‘ clearly states that special interests, NOT YOU THE VOTER, are taking over local control.

“Department of Homeland Security, Venture Smarter, Regional Smart Cities Initiatives, ITSA, Uber, Lyft, Con Edison, Nokia, Smart Cities Council, and other organizations all contributed to a productive conversation focused on helping Congress prioritize policy and funding efforts to accelerate the research, development, and implementation of new transportation technologies and strategies that can more efficiently and effectively move people and goods in urban, suburban, and rural communities across the country.”

Is this what you want?

When in doubt change your name.

It is no secret that “Public Private Partnerships”, or PPPs are what is driving our government. Special interests are being served with YOUR tax dollars.

Now that people are waking up to this, those who promote PPPs have decided it’s time to change their branding.

According to the IMF,
“Public Private Partnerships, (PPPs), which are a controversial source of funding for government projects, are back at the current World Bank IMF meetings in Washington, under a new name — Blended Finance. Proponents say that blended finance is a way to fund the $2.5 trillion a year needed to ‘support progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set forth by the United Nations.'”

Read more at Forbes…