For information on this project please visit http://www.petitionproject.org/
Category Archives: Local
Nashua Grant is Abject Waste of Your Tax Dollars
What an abject WASTE of our tax dollars. First off there IS NO SIGNIFICANT or UNNATURAL GLOBAL WARMING and secondly, these RPCs as we have demonstrated here many times before, are illegal, unconstitutional entities that are forcing Federal programs upon our towns, without our consent, using our tax dollars.
SB 315 Called for New Certification Board for Building Inspectors
But bill dies in committee
We’d like to have given Senator Sharon Carson the benefit of the doubt, but it was tough when her husband Gregory Carson is the lead lawyer and representative for HUD in NH.
When anyone questions the Granite State Future program, he is the one they send to put out the fires and quell the ‘myths’. Only he hasn’t convinced those who have done our homework about how intrusive and binding it is for towns, once they accept these ‘sustainability’ grants, to circumvent the mandates.
The question is, you have to wonder why his wife, Senator Sharon Carson, was sponsoring legislation to establish “the board of building officials for the certification and regulation of persons enforcing the state building code and conducting building inspections.”
As it turns out, the bill went to “interim study” which means “death with dignity”. Good thing for that. We couldn’t help but think this was yet another tactic in a multi-pronged attack on our local control, a measure being taken to ensure that the ‘board’ is zoning ordinance friendly, that is to say, zoning ordinances that come with or are changed by participation in federal grants such as Granite State Future.
Using Our Tax Dollars for Lobbying?
This is illegal, and if it’s not, it should be.
RPCs are using our tax dollars, which is how they are funded, to support or oppose legislation that they find favorable to their cause, which was handed down by the federal government.
http://www.nharpc.org/images/stories/documents/legislative_consulting_services_rfp_080514.pdf
http://www.nharpc.org/images/stories/documents/2013%20bills%20update%202-22.pdf
Global Governance and Religion
If there was ever any doubt in your mind about whether the environmental agenda (Agenda 21) is being used to bring about global or “world” government, this is just one of the smoking guns.
The United Nations has even attempted to recruit religious groups to their cause.
This damning document says it all.
Information Packet for Religion and World Order Program Project Global 2000
Any candidate who still espouses man-made global warming is falling in with the enemy.
Building One America – Regionalism’s Ruse
One Bay Area: A Template for Regional Governance Advocated by “Build One America”
If the above video does not appear on your device, use this direct link:
http://youtu.be/e4G5S1TBC4U
From the notes:
Stanley Kurtz wrote a book, Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities exposes the efforts of the administrative state, in conjunction with social equity interests, to regionalize decision making and funding for what in the past have been local government decisions. It includes requiring suburbs to take their “fair share” of all income levels. No where is this more obvious than in the San Francisco Bay Area with the One Bay Area Plan/Plan Bay Area. Regional unelected bureaucrats tell every city in the Bay Area how many housing units they MUST be prepared to accommodate. For many of the small village type towns, this will force their urbanization and destroy their uniqueness. Kurtz identifies an organization called Building One America. Here is a video, in their own words, of their plans.
Terms used by Build One America in the video include:
Zoning out the poor
Affordable housing
Affordable transportation
Livable communities
Regional Opportunity Agenda
Combating poverty=controlling urban sprawl
Vestiges of segregation=suburbs
Segregation=sprawl=inequality
Suburbs must do their “fair share”
Metropolitan wide accept responsibility
All these terms and ideas are spread liberally throughout the One Bay Area Plan. MTC-ABAG are the epitome of regionalisation, taking control out of the hands of local city councils and mayors. The Obama Administration is firmly behind this effort through the support of Valarie Jarrett and Ronald Sims. California is one of the initial test cases. This is soon to be unleashed across the country if Obama gets a second term.
This is a shortened version of a video that was posted on the Building One America website (www.buildingoneamerica.org). The complete video can be viewed here http://youtu.be/3hty8teX4us
Megacities — WHY?
New urbanism has an ulterior motive that is dark.
The Nightmarish Megacities of the Near Future speaks to the goals of Agenda 21 and how it will be implemented under the guise of “smartness”.
Excerpt:
The Truth About Megacities Is Out In the Open
Where ever you find a bold new initiative related to the plans of the global elite, you will find documentation arising from various think tank organizations in support of these goals. With regard to the coming forced subjugation of the American population to the “stack and pack” megacities, two important papers, the 3-D: Infrastructure for California’s Future and the National Academy of Public Administration’s “Memos to National Leaders: Partnerships as Fiscal Policy”, jump to the front of the line in espousing the megacities concept.
These papers focus on how tax restructuring can be used to finance and build the new megacities. I wrote about these tax plans emanating from Obama’s community activist mentor, Mike Krulig and his group known as Building One America, in a previous article. These papers detail the plan to depopulate and destroy the suburbs and the rural areas of America while diverting the tax base derived from the suburbs and rural towns, cities and counties and using that money to construct the infrastructure of the megacities.
Please read the full article The Nightmarish Megacities of the Near Future for embedded links.
Agenda 21: Global Conspiracy or Climate Savior?
Updated Article: 7/19 5:27 PM
“These events and many others like them are connected by one resonant term: Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is a United Nations advisory document, adopted in 1992 by 178 signatory nations including the U.S., which provides guidelines for sustainable development. But opponents of the plan see it as something more sinister: In her book Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, Koire describes Agenda 21 as “the action plan to inventory and control all human beings and resources on the planet.” Koire’s book has become a common manifesto for the dozens of groups and untold thousands of individuals across America opposing the document, its goals, and what they see as its vast influence.”
Amazingly, while denying international involvement, they cite ICLEI, the UN’s sustainability arm which has worked its way into many local governments.
“According to Michael Schmitz, executive director of the U.S. chapter of the ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability, there has been a broad rise in these sorts of incidents, with “a very small but very vocal group of protesters who will essentially try to disrupt the process [of local planning meetings].””
If the plan is to disrupt the process of Soviet-style top down direction of our lives by central planners via unelected boards, be prepared for more.
Our hero, Rosa Koire, is mentioned.
Here is her response.
Fortune Magazine (Fortune 500/Time, Inc.) published an article yesterday highlighting me and our fight against UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. The article is a nuanced manipulation that lies by omission and half-truths, and slimes by intent. David Morris, the author, brings in ICLEI public relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center to ‘balance’ the article, and then concludes that Agenda 21 is necessary to save the planet — it ‘requires some sacrifices, not all of them made entirely willingly’.
The following quote is from our interview; David Morris asked me if I had anything to add.
I guess what I want to ask you, David, is how committed you are to representing a particular point of view that’s going to marginalize what I’ve told you? I’m hoping that you’re going to write an article that is genuine and fair… We have something serious going on in our country and around the world and it needs to be dealt with in a serious manner. If the major corporations which own the media are controlling that information we will not be able to get that information out to the people so that they can make these decisions for themselves. So I’m hoping — you have an opportunity here — and I’m really hoping that you’re going to use it.
Watch the interview here on YouTube. Judge for yourself how the media operates to manipulate public opinion and block the truth.
Here is Rosa’s rebuttal to what she calls a “smear” article by Forbes. [Video]
Sadly Rosa passed away on May 31, 2021
Are there plans to bring Agenda 21 to your town?
“Sustainability” is the hot new buzzword on the left.
It’s the kind of word that sounds nice when you first stumble into it, but like everything else in the world of the eco-left, it really means control.
It’s what United Nation’s Agenda 21 is all about.
What might surprise you is that controversy over Agenda 21 tends to arise not from the dramatics imposition of its principles from above (like global warming), but from attempts to quietly insert UN dogma into local cities and towns.
Take a look at CFACT senior policy analyst Bonner Cohen’s article on CFACT.org
Bonner reports that, “planning commissions, which have spread like wildfire over the past couple of decades and whose members are unelected, produce an endless array of schemes designed to micro-manage every aspect of commercial, residential, and recreational life. No town, no matter how small, is safe from the meddling of planners in and outside of government.”
Are there plans to bring Agenda 21 to your town?
Is it already there?
You and your neighbors need to know.
Save Your Land Meeting a Success
Save Your Land Keene held an informational meeting on Saturday April 26th featuring Rep Jane Cormier and Ken Eyring, GSF researcher.
Attached is a picture of a person who challenged the speakers.
We are hoping someone can identify this person, who refused to give his name or sign into the event.
The event-goers did note he had no facts to back up his assertion that Ken or Jane were wrong in their research on HUD contracts via Granite State Future RPC “central planning” schemes.
