Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Governor Baker is Working for the New World Regional Order

Even the educational system cannot escape the tyranny of the consolidation of power, geared toward the concentration of it under one single authority, as dreamed of by Zbigniew Brezinski.

This is Governor Baker of Massachusetts.

And this is how they are planning on wasting your tax dollars in New Hampshire — expensive consultants and wacky unworkable plans for the students.

Specifically, here is that high priced consultantcy who will be sent in to tell your teachers and students what they should be doing, and God help anyone that doesn’t comply.

PDF File: NH Vision Interactive

NHCRN Bears Watching

COMING TO YOUR TOWN MEETING SOON

A Community Rights legal group (www.celdf.org) planned to demand their “collective rights” at town meetings across Maine, NH and Mass., as stated in their invitation to meet in 2012. Once again they are going to invade town meetings in 2016. Since the group SOMETIMES may hit on a issue with which we agree, but not always, they bear watching. Please remember that in 2012, they refused to allow a sitting state representative access to their meeting.

CELDF Excludes Sitting State Rep From Planning Session

Here are the details on their event for 2016.

——————–
Dear NHCRN Members, Supporters, and Friends,

RIGHT OF LOCAL COMMUNITY SELF-GOVERNMENT, LSR# 2352 HCACR

Representative Susan Emerson of Cheshire County, District 11 has submitted the NHCRN proposed language for a constitutional amendment to recognize the Right of Local Community Self-Government at the state level!

READ ALL ABOUT IT IN THE SECOND ISSUE OF THE NHCRN QUARTERLY UPDATE! (Attached below)

You will find the NHCRN proposed Right of Local Community Self-Government amendment language and the 2016 Community Rights Resolution in support of the proposed amendment on the website at: http://nhcommunityrights.org/projects/statewide-constitutional-change/

The NHCRN Quarterly Update is attached in PDF format which may, or may not allow active links when opened. For best viewing, please visit the NHCRN website at http://www.nhcommunityrights.org, or click on this link to go directly to the Quarterly Update file – http://nhcommunityrights.org/nhcrn-newsletter-volume-1-issue-2/


SAVE THE DATE!

NHCRN Quarterly Meeting

Right of Local Community Self-Government Amendment Sponsored!
NH Community Rights Resolution for 2016 Town Meeting!

Sunday, November 1st from 2:00 – 5:00 PM
(Daylight Savings! – Remember to turn your clocks back one hour)

Barnstead Town Hall, 108 S. Barnstead Rd., Center Barnstead, NH 03225

This is an opportunity to come together and share what is happening in our communities and across our state. This is an “open” meeting, so please feel free to invite friends and neighbors from your surrounding communities!

Light Refreshments will be Provided

If you have questions about the upcoming NHCRN Quarterly Meeting, or would like to make a suggestion for an Agenda Item, please email info@nhcommunityrights.org

All the best,

Michelle

Michelle Sanborn
NHCRN Coordinator
603-524-2468
info@nhcommunityrights.org
www.nhcommunityrights.org

NHCRN QUARTERLY UPDATE [PDF]
——————–

31 States File Suit Against EPA Water Rule

We have to ask, why isn’t New Hampshire part of this lawsuit?

(CN) – The Sixth Circuit on Friday stayed a new Environmental Protection Agency rule defining “Waters of the United States” that 31 states accuse of trampling their sovereignty.

Attorneys general from 31 states asked the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers in July to delay implementation of a Clean Water Act rule for at least nine months for judicial review.

The rule defines “Waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. The states claim it asserts federal jurisdiction over streams, wetlands and other water bodies previously considered to be under their jurisdiction.

Sixth Circuit Stays New EPA Water Rule

Liberty Farm The Story of Martha Boneta

Martha Boneta is the kind of person who need to be protected from the government.

Even if you don’t own a farm, this is a must-see story.

“The film, just 28 minutes long, tells the story of Martha Boneta, who bought a small farm in Virginia and tried to make a go of it by selling produce and so on. She was viciously harassed by a variety of government agencies and environmental groups who evidently intended to drive her out of business.

It appears to be a classic example of the abuse of regulatory power to promote private interests and ideological agendas. Ms. Boneta’s farm home was subjected to repeated and apparently purposeless inspections of closets, bathrooms and so on. At one point, she was cited for holding an “event” without obtaining thousands of dollars worth of licenses and permits. The “event” was a birthday party for a friend’s daughter.”

Farming in Fear

Straight Talk from Tom DeWeese

from Tom DeWeese

Do you want to FIGHT… or do you want to WHINE?

This week the UN will hold yet another international gathering to announce what can only be called a “re-boot” of Agenda 21 – as they are determined to finish the job to “Transform the World.”

I guarantee you will not like that transformation!

BUT, this event gives our movement a huge opportunity to put Agenda 21 in the headlines of every newspaper and newscast in the nation.

There they are – perhaps 50,000 strong – The Pope, 189 Heads of State, NGO’s, diplomats, bureaucrats – all the people who have been claiming that Agenda 21 is a hoax – all sharing the stage to introduce a new 17 point, 15 year plan to “TRANSFORM THE WORLD.” Those are THEIR words!

They are confirming everything we’ve said about Agenda 21. They are proving we have been telling the truth! They are helping remove the tin foil hats from our heads! What more could we ask for???

SO WILL YOU FIGHT???? OR WILL YOU WHINE????

Every day I receive notes, calls, and emails, from people saying we have lost the Republic- that the fight is over.

And then they spend a lot of words telling ME about how SOMEONE must DO SOMETHING. (usually translated to “I” must do something).

Well, you see – I HAVE DONE SOMETHING. I have spent the past 23 years fighting Agenda 21. First I sounded the alarm – as few listened.

Then over the past 5 years I’ve been working to answer the call of SOMEONE MUST DO SOMETHING!!

I’ve created teaching webinars, tools, strategies, written manuals, and created the most extensive Stop Agenda 21 Action Kit ever presented.

I’ve traveled the nation, speaking, teaching and motivating people in nearly every state. My intention is for them to be inspired to take up the battle, to do some research of their own community situation, and engage in the fight. Some do. Many don’t.

BUT STILL I HEAR THE WHINE… “SOMEONE MUST DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!”

So let’s try this again! Over the past several months I have created some new tools and ideas to carry our fight to the enemy.

And these are FREE!

Again, – these are for YOU to do something!


Four Questions

In April, I issued a Sledgehammer Action Alert calling on all Anti-Agenda 21 activists to begin to bombard Presidential candidates with a series of questions.

I said if the candidates are asked these questions over and over at every speech, our fight against Sustainable Development policy will begin to take center stage in the campaign. In fact, these questions can be asked of any candidates or elected officials.

Here they are:

Property Rights Question
1. If elected, what actions will you take to protect the unrestricted right of use, enjoyment and disposal of private property by its owners?

Regional Government Question
2. If elected, what actions will you take to eliminate these massive grant programs and to stop federal efforts to enforce creation of non-elected boards, councils and regional governments?

Federal Grant Program Question
3. If elected, will you take action to help stop the erosion of local control by ending federal grant programs that dictate local planning programs?

Social Justice Question
4. If elected, will you take action to shut down the federal Department of Education and return education policy to the states, making sure to end these orchestrated attacks on the attitudes, values and beliefs of the children?

For more tools, please visit American Policy Center

Will the EPA’s “Clean Water Rule” Rule Affect You?

Researched by D. Niwa

Remember several years ago when they passed the new additions (include non-navigable waterways) to the “Clean Water Act”, and we said it would lead to this?

https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/wyoming-rancher-s-case-shows-why-so-many-businesses-are-worried-about-epa-s-water

Will the EPA’s “Clean Water Rule” Rule Affect You?

Some will be affected directly, everyone else will be affected indirectly due to the impact on businesses. Links below to four articles about the “Clean Water Rule.”[1] Too bad that most U.S. policy-makers have not and are not paying attention to this issue because it is coming back to bite us.

Note: This is an extension of U.N. Agenda 21 “sustainable development” plans. The EPA is a lead agency in the U.S. to implement environment-related United Nation’s global policies. The plans are adopted and put into U.S. legislation by elected officials in the U.S. Congress. In this case, authorization comes by way of the congressionally-approved “Federal Water Pollution Control Act.”

Endnote:
[1] Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘’Waters of the United States’’; Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 90, No. 124, June 29, 2015. Download pdf: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/epa-hq-ow-2011-0880-20862.pdf

EPA water rule takes effect in some states
By Timothy Cama – 08/28/15 09:37 AM EDT | The Hill
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/252165-epa-water-rule-takes-effect-in-some-states

Excerpt: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) started enforcing its controversial water pollution jurisdiction rule Friday in all but 13 states.

Friday marks 60 days after the rule, known as the Clean Water Rule, was published in the Federal Register and the day that the agency planned to start enforcement along with the Army Corps of Engineers.

In response to a petition from 13 states, a North Dakota federal judge temporarily blocked the rule’s implementation late Thursday, ruling that the states would likely suffer if it took effect and that they are likely to succeed when their underlying lawsuit against the rule is decided.

Excerpt: The preliminary injunction, Harrison said, applies only in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.

Here’s What You Need to Know About EPA’s Overreaching Water Rule
U.S. Chamber Staff | Aug. 28, 2015 – 11:45AM
https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/here-s-what-you-need-know-about-epa-s-overreaching-water-rule

Excerpt: EPA’s controversial Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) rule went into effect–but not everywhere.

It drastically expands the reach of the federal government.

How 4 Industries Will Get Soaked by Federal Water Rule
SEAN HACKBARTH
Senior Editor, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
AUG 28, 2015 – 5:00PM
https://www.uschamber.com/above-the-fold/how-4-industries-will-get-soaked-federal-water-rule

Excerpt: Editor’s note: EPA has begun enforcing its new definition of Waters of the U.S. This post, originally published on November 13, 2014, looks at how specific industries will be affected by this federal overreach.

Farmers and home builders know that doing business will drastically change for the worse if the new definition of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) goes into effect.

For farmers, they fear they “may not be able to weed and feed your lawn, spray for bugs, landscape with treated lumber and wood chips, fill in a low area with soil, or even dig a hole without” a federal permit.

For home builders still recovering from the Great Recessions’ housing market collapse, the new water regulations will mean added costs and uncertainty. As a Missouri home builder told the House Small Business Committee, “Builders would face new, costly delays just waiting for the agencies to determine if a road ditch is a ‘Water of the United States.'”

They’re not alone. From retail stores to gravel companies to railroads, many other industries will be harmed by this federal overreach. Here are four examples taken from comments to federal regulators from the U.S. Chamber and 375 other trade associations.

[Wyoming] A Wyoming Rancher’s Case Shows Why So Many Businesses Are Worried About EPA’s Water Rule
Sean Hackbarth, Senior Editor, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
SEP 01, 2015 – 9:30AM

Excerpt:

Wyoming rancher Andy Johnson wanted to build a pond on his property for his cattle. He got the necessary state permits and did it. Cattle now drink from the pond, and birds and fish call it home.

But Johnson didn’t ask federal officials if he could build the pond. EPA came along and told him he had to fill it in. Johnson refused and is being fined $37,000 per day by the agency.

Johnson’s fight with the federal government illustrates why there has been such outcry over EPA’s new water rule, the Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS)—a rule that extends federal jurisdiction over nearly every body of water in the United States.

Are You Guilty of Thought Crimes?

Apparently some folks think you ought to be prosecuted for thinking ‘wrongly’.

As outrageous as it may seem, it is true that “…20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming.

Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that ‘have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.'”

SO, if you have not accepted AWG as a science you would be prosecuted as a thought criminal?

Read More…

Concerned About Northern Pass?

Do you think the Concord area is worth protecting from outdated transmission towers and lines? Do you want to know more before it’s too late?

You’re invited…

to learn about the Northern Pass proposal, how the project would impact Concord neighborhoods and the rest of the 190-mile proposed route… and what you can do to influence decision makers in the coming weeks.

What: A Northern Pass Informational Session

Who: Hosted by the Society for the Protection of N.H. Forests and the Appalachian Mountain Club

When: Thursday, Sept. 24, 6:00 – 8:00 PM

Where: Mill Brook Elementary School multi-purpose room, 53 S. Curtisville Road, Concord

Why: Northern Pass’s latest proposal to build an electric transmission line to carry hydropower from Quebec through New Hampshire calls for burying just about a third of the 190-mile line. That means the towns and cities — including Concord — along the remaining two-thirds of the route still would have to sacrifice views and landscapes for the benefit of a private corporation.

We think that’s wrong, and we’d like to show you why. Please attend the informational session this Thursday night to become informed about the proposal.

To see news stories, op/eds and more information about Northern Pass, please visit our Northern Pass pages and blog at http://www.forestsociety.org/np

For more information about the information session, please call 224-9945.

New Water Rule Effective in July 2015

This is from Alabama farmers who are keeping on top of the issue. It will affect farmers in every state.

Alabama farmers and landowners will soon be scouting fields to determine which features may be classified as “waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) under the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new rule.

The rule, which takes effect Friday, Aug. 28, expands the EPA’s jurisdiction on private lands. As a result, previously common farming and forestry practices could require a permit or be subject to large penalties.

“It’s important that farmers learn about the changes included in this rule, because it will impact everyday farming activities,” said Mitt Walker, National Legislative Programs director for the Alabama Farmers Federation. “The only way for farmers to be certain that a feature is classified as a water is to request a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the Army Corps of Engineers.”

Certain WOTUS features are easily identifiable, such as rivers and streams. However, under the new rule, ditches and seasonally wet areas in fields may be subject to regulation.

Farming practices that could require a permit under the Clean Water Act (CWA) include applying pesticides or fertilizers; grading, plowing or terracing a field; and constructing fences, ditches or ponds. The permit is required whether the area is dry or wet.

“Dredge and fill” exemptions from permitting requirements exist; however, the EPA has a history of narrowly interpreting the exemptions.

There is still time for the courts to allow for an injunction that would delay rule implementation. Twelve lawsuits, filed against the rule since June, were consolidated to be heard together before the 6th Circuit Court in Cincinnati, Ohio.

In May, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to prevent implementation, and a similar measure passed the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in June. However, Congress is in recess through Sept. 7, and President Barack Obama has defended the regulation.

Meanwhile, the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) suggests farmers protect themselves by asking for a jurisdictional determination; avoiding “discharge” activities in areas that may be considered a WOTUS; applying for the “dredge and fill” exemption; or applying for the Section 402 or 404 permit.

Click here for an AFBF document that explains more about the rule’s impacts on farmers.

See more on AlfaFarmers.org